aba events
Nikon Monarch 7

    Traveling Light(er)

    I’m excited about a new bird photography lens I have for my DSLR- Sigma’s 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 offering. (Yeah, you read right- 50-500mm!)  This is an optically stabilized, APO glass lens with a very fast autofocus system.   Sigma produces versions of the lens for Nikon, Canon, Sony, Minolta, Pentax, and Sigma camera mounts.

    CRCA_landing-lr1

    Crested Caracara near Brownsville, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    Two recent events turned me on to this lens.  First, I was birding with my friend Steve Mlodinow who was sporting a remarkably compact DSLR rig and getting great images.  I was pretty floored when he told me about the jaw-dropping 10X range of the zoom, and that it topped out at 500mm (~750mm equivalent on most DSLR bodies.)  While far from small, the lens was substantially shorter (with zoom fully retracted) and lighter than my big Nikon 200-400mm f/4.  Crazily, he could get serviceable digiscoped images through his Kowa scope with the lens pulled all the way back to 50mm or reach out at full 500mm zoom for more traditional telephoto work all with the same lens!

    GRPA_McAllen-12
    Green Parakeets, McAllen, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    The second impetus to look seriously at getting the lens was an upcoming bird photography tour in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas which had me trying to sort out how I’d fly down with both DSLR rig and scope in my trusty WRP MP-1 camera bag (a carry-on that fits every overhead compartment I’ve yet tried- even those in little twin turboprop planes.)  Ordinarily, on birding trips involving flights I pack my big DSLR glass and use a friend’s scope (or go scopeless), but as trip leader I was obligated to have a scope along.  The Sigma 50-500mm (hereafter “Bigma“) easily shared the photo pack with my D300 camera body, spotting scope, bins, flash, and other accoutrements.  All photos in this post are from my recent LRGV trip taken with the Bigma on a Nikon D300 body.

    APFA_flight_lr1
    Aplomado Falcon near Brownsville, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    Now don’t get me wrong- I love my Nikon 200-400 f/4 and have no immediate plans to give it up.  But it is a mighty piece of ballast to carry around, at about 7.4 lbs. and nearly 15″ long (sans hood.)  In contrast, the Bigma tips the scales at 4.3 lbs. and collapses down to a scant 8.6″ long.  In addition to bulk & weight, big telephotos by both Nikon & Canon (f/4 or f/2.8) all share another painful trait- prices in the high thousands (ouch!)  While not cheap, the ~$1650 price tag on the Bigma is certainly a lot more palatable.

    CCGR_pharr-24
    Crimson-collared Grosbeak, Pharr, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    I’ve been a fan of modern high-end zoom telephotos ever since I got a Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 and later upgraded to my Nikon 200-400mm f/4, enjoying their versatility without the need for frequent lens switching.  The Bigma takes this to a new extreme, letting me pull all the way back to 50mm (75mm equivalent on most DSLR bodies) for scenics, people pics, or flock shots.  While most of the time I want maximum magnification for bird photography, there are times where an intermediate telephoto setting is also very nice to have at hand, such as with close birds and for difficult flight shots.  I found the Bigma to perform quite well across its zoom range, yielding sharp images so long as I payed attention to good hand-holding technique & maintained adequate shutter speed.

    GRRO_head_Falcon-1
    Greater Roadrunner, Falcon State Park, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    One change I had to make when using this lens was to bump my ISO up a notch or two above what I’d usually use with my Nikon 200-400 f/4 (or f/5.6 when used with a 1.4X teleconverter as I usually do.)  The Bigma yields f/6.3 at full zoom and so I’d often go to ISO 500, 640, or 800 depending on the degree of sunlight or shade to keep shutter speeds up.  I was very pleased with the focus speed, finding that the lens did a nice job on flight shots and pulling little birds out of brushy & branchy settings.  The only trouble I had was picking out little targets when it was extremely dark, like in a combination of heavy forest on cloudy days.  I found myself wishing for a focus range limiter switch as well- something my Nikon 200-400 sports.  This is nice for things like flying birds, significantly cutting down on the focus cycle time as the lens “searches” for its target.  A nice touch is the Bigma’s zoom lock, which keeps the lens tube from expanding as you carry it around.  I just wouldn’t want to forget to switch it off when trying to zoom in on a bird!

      LEBI_yawn_lr2
    Least Bittern, South Padre Island, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    I found that the Bigma was reasonably comfortable to carry around all day, even with a scope rig on my other shoulder.  Maybe it’s just that I’m just getting older but I rarely try to pull off a scope/DSLR carrying combo for long sessions using my bulky Nikon 200-400.  The Bigma’s lighter weight also makes it easier to swing onto & track flying birds while hand-holding the lens compared to my bigger glass.  The image stabilization (OS in Sigma parlance) worked well, allowing hand-holding down to pretty slow shutter speeds provided the bird also cooperated by standing still.

    MUDU_lr1
    Muscovy Duck, Salineño, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    In optics, the saying that you get what you pay for generally rings true.  If you are after a magazine cover or routinely make large prints then sticking with a tripod-mounted f/4 or f/2.8 telephoto is probably the best bet.  But for traveling &/or photographing birds on an opportunistic basis as you are birding I think the Bigma is a fantastic option to have.  Nikon & Canon have similar offerings (their 80-400mm & 100-400mm zoom telephotos), but I think that the Sigma 50-500mm will give those a serious run for the money with its longer reach and astounding 10X zoom range.

    PLCH_Laguna-4lr
    Plain Chachalaca, Laguna Atascosa NWR, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    Sunrise_Laguna-2
    Sunrise, Laguna Atascosa NWR, Texas, March 2011.  © Bill Schmoker

    The following two tabs change content below.
    Bill Schmoker

    Bill Schmoker

    Bill is known in the birding community as a leading digital photographer of birds. Since 2001 he has built a collection of digital bird photos documenting over 640 species of North American birds. His photography has appeared in international nature publications, books, newspapers, interpretive signs, web pages, advertisements, corporate logos, and as references for art works. Also a published writer, Bill wrote a chapter for Good Birders Don't Wear White, is a past Colorado/Wyoming regional editor for North American Birds and is proud to be on the Leica Birding Team. Bill is a Colorado eBird reviewer and is especially fond of his involvement with the ABA's Institute for Field Ornithology and Young Birder Programs. Bill is a popular birding guide, speaker, and workshop instructor, and teaches middle school science in Boulder, Colorado. When he isn’t birding he enjoys family time with his wife and son.
    Bill Schmoker

    Latest posts by Bill Schmoker (see all)

    • http://profile.typepad.com/dalybar Lynn Barber

      I am nearly immobilized by yearning for that lens! Wonderful pictures. Sadly there are a few critical needs in line before I can think of getting one (like mortgage down-payment, moving expenses…). But someday…

    • Eric DeFonso

      Great writeup Bill! I’ve been thinking a lot about photography (especially technique) lately, although like Lynn I can’t say that upgrading my modest camera is the highest priority for me. (A guy can dream though, can’t he?) While traveling I find that I am learning a great deal about what I want with my next DSLR and how to make the best use of what I have. Your commentary, despite being about a system I don’t have, still helps me feel like I’m actually figuring things out. Love the shop talk!

    • http://profile.typepad.com/chaetura Chaetura

      Interestingly the Pentax version is only designed for full frame cameras although it says it may be compatible w/ APS-C sensors giving an effective focal length of 75-750 mm. So it will be interesting to see how it performs on the Pentax K series cameras (I have the entry level K-x). Also Pentax K series cameras have image stabilization built into the camera body so this may be overkill. It will be interesting to check the Pentax forum for early adopters. Also possible the older non-stabilized 50-550 (bigmas) being discontinued (or perhaps available at closeout prices?).

    • http://egretsnest.wordpress.com/ Liza Lee Miller

      Well, I’d been wondering what lens I should get for better bird shots. Now I know. Off to figure out how many pennies I should save up. . .

    Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome.
    If you like birding, we want to hear from you.
    Read More »

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    Authors

    Archives

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    • Book Review: The Sibley Guide to Birds, 2nd Edition June 25, 2014 6:30
      In 2000, the birding world greeted the arrival of the revolutionary new Sibley Guide to Birds. Now, 13 years later, we welcome the long awaited updated second edition of our favorite field guide. […]
    • Meet Chloe Walker: 2014 ABA Young Birder of the Year June 17, 2014 8:51
      Although I "officially" started birding when I was eleven, my interest in birds began when I was nine. I remember taking my mom's camera outside and just "playing around" with it. […]
    • Open Mic: Fruits of the Future June 13, 2014 6:56
      It was a winter morning, the cloudy skies blocked out the brilliance of the sun. A chilly wind ran through the treetops like a group of mad, fast-moving invisible Capuchin monkeys. The branches of a nearby tree were shaking uncontrollably and the delicate stems could not support the weight of its leaves and blooming flowers. […]

    Follow ABA on Twitter

    Nature Blog Network