aba events
Nikon Monarch 7

    The ABA, Wikipedia, and You

    Wikipedia-logo (1)Google the word “birding” and one of the very first hits will surely be the Wikipedia entry for our passion and pastime. See for yourself:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birding

    The entry runs to 4,982 words, according to my computer, covering such topics as “The history of birdwatching,” “Competition,” “Code of conduct,” and “Famous birdwatchers.” And this: “Networking and organization.”

    The entry for “Networking and organization” is a mere 95 words long. It has links to five “prominent national and continental organizations,” three of them based in Britain, two of them from the United States. One of the American entries is the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, the other is our very own American Birding Association. (Note to old school grammarians: I’m certain that that comma is superior to a semicolon or coordinating conjunction.)


    So I clicked on the link to “American Birding Association,” and I got to a 239-word entry on the ABA. Topics covered: the ABA’s move toward a more inclusive conception of its membership; the ABA’s Code of Birding Ethics; and the ABA’s multi-authored blog, that is to say, the forum in which I’m writing right now. As many of us know, The ABA Blog recently celebrated its first birthday, which means that this particular Wikipedia entry has been updated within the past year. I’ll say more about that later.

    November coverOh. One other item caught my eye: “The ABA publishes Birding, its bimonthly magazine.” I clicked on the link to “Birding,” and that took me to a 664-word entry on our bimonthly members’ magazine.

    More than half the total verbiage (345 words, or 52%) was devoted to a single topic. Care to guess what that topic was? Perhaps bird identification? Maybe bird finding? Listing? Binoculars?

    Nope. None of those. Rather, “Demographics of birders.”

    Like you, I’m surprised.

    Conference logoDon’t get me wrong. I’m delighted by the coverage. And the topic is more timely than ever. Recently, the ABA—represented by President Jeff Gordon and board member Kenn Kaufman—participated in an important symposium on Changing the Face of American Birding.

    I’m way into the sociology of birding. And I suppose that interest—some might say that bias—of mine might conceivably influence content in Birding. But not too much, I hope. I’m wary, to say the least, of editors with agendas. I hope I got that point across in a commentary beginning on p. 56 of the November 2010 issue of Birding.

    Wait. I do have an agenda, come to think of it, an overarching agenda, a “prime directive,” if you will. It is this: to give voice, on the pages of Birding, to the diverse voices and aspirations of the birding community in North America and beyond. (Sound familiar? I said as much, in a post back in March to The ABA Blog.)

    Simply put, there’s more to Birding than articles on “Demographics of birders.” In other words, this Wikipedia entry is out of balance.

    It’s also out of date. In the first paragraph of the entry, content of the magazine is described “as of 2007.” In this internet era, four years is a long time. The entry for Birding magazine is badly in need of an update.

    And, honestly, most of the rest of the Wikipedia coverage of the ABA and its programs would benefit from a makeover.

    Before I go any further, I want to be very clear about something: I intend no criticism, none whatsoever, of the folks who have contributed to the Wikipedia entries for Birding magazine and other offerings of the ABA. Indeed, I am highly grateful for the exposure.

    But we need more of it! The Wikipedia entries for the ABA and its programs need to be updated, expanded, and rebalanced.

    And that’s where YOU come in. Anybody can contribute content to Wikipedia. It’s a piece of cake. Start off by going to:

    Logo-ABAhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Birding_Association

    Then click on “Edit,” up toward the upper right.

    Then fire away!

    It’s that easy. It really is.

    Now you might be saying, “Gee, Ted, why don’t you do it?” Or “Maybe David Hartley, the ABA’s Director of Communications, could do it”? Or perhaps President Jeff Gordon or blogmeister Nate Swick?

    True, any one of the four of us could do it. So could anybody else on the staff at the ABA.

    But there’s that old problem of bias. Check out Wikipedia entries for “Occupy Wall Street” and “Tea Party Protests,” for example, and you’ll see red flags—actually, they’re yellow and orange, respectively—up front. The best Wikipedia entries are those that benefit from the broad contributions of interested, intelligent, and neutral e-citizens.

    Yes, I’m talking about YOU.

    What are you waiting for? Go on! Do it! You can put in as much or as little work as you like. Add a factoid; fix a bad URL; or rework a sentence that doesn’t quite get the point across. Or write brand-new content. For starters, the entry on Birding magazine could use a little help.

    A final thought. There’s been a lot of talk lately about public perceptions of birding and of birders. (The Big Year, anyone?) Like it or not, Wikipedia is how a sizable chunk of the world gets information. A newbie’s first contact with birding and the ABA might well be via Wikipedia.

    A final, final thought. I’m not asking—and neither, I’m sure, would any of my colleagues on staff—for a sugar-coating of the ABA. We just want a thorough, accurate, unbiased, well-informed accounting on Wikipedia of what the ABA is all about. I stand by our product, the American Birding Association. And I’m confident that YOU, contributors to and readers of The ABA Blog, are the best-qualified persons in the world for educating the general public about birders, birding, and the ABA.

     

    The following two tabs change content below.
    Ted Floyd

    Ted Floyd

    Ted Floyd is the Editor of Birding magazine, and he is broadly involved in other programs and initiatives of the ABA. He is the author of more than 100 magazine and journal articles, and has written four recent books, including an ABA title, the ABA Guide to Birds of Colorado. Floyd is a frequent speaker at birding festivals and state ornithological society meetings, and he has served on the boards of several nonprofit organizations. Mainly, he listens to birds at night.
    Ted Floyd

    Latest posts by Ted Floyd (see all)

    • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds Megan Crewe

      It’s not just the ABA entries that could use some help. Many of Wikipedia’s bird entries are mere stubs, with little more than the most basic of information. There’s a great, very active project that’s working to correct that, and we’re always looking for new members. Interested in learning more about some aspect of birding? Do a little research and write about it for the world! I’ve been part of the project for nearly 4.5 years now, and have greatly enjoyed the opportunity to expand (and share) my knowledge while working with committed birders/environmentalists from around the globe.

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Megan, can you tell us a little more about this “great, very active project”? Sounds fantastic.

      Is it British? (Which is fine, of course.) I detect a large dollop of British English in a lot of the Wikipedia content on birds–especially on bird conservation.

    • Duncan

      Ted, The project megan alludes to is the Bird Wikiproject, of which both of us are members. You can find us here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds > The members come from the US, Australia the UK, India and New Zealand amongst others. English usage varies by subject, American birds should be in American English, British in British,etc, and shared or unaffiliated birds or articles generally in the language they were first written (many of which were started by a Brit).

      I agree with the thrust of your article, we could very certainly do to improve the articles you mentioned, along with many others, and we’d love for ABA members to work on those articles!

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Thanks, Duncan, for this info. I’ve just looked over the guidelines for the project, and the whole thing looks great. (And we’ve given it some exposure via http://twitter.com/BirdingMagazine, feeding straight to http://aba.org.)

      I’d like now to emphasize just how incredibly easy it for anybody to contribute to this effort, and to make a difference, right now, immediately.

      For example, I just typed into my browser the phrase “American Kestrel Wikipedia.” (American Kestrel happens to the 2011 ABA Bird of the Year.) I browsed the entry, and quickly found a statement that was a bit unclear. So I changed it. It’s that easy! It really is!

      All of us can do it. All of us can make a difference. All of us can inform the broader e-public about the birds we love to watch.

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Marvelous!

      I just checked out the ABA’s Wikipedia page:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Birding_Association

      And I see that it’s been importantly updated in the past day or so. Many thanks to whoever did that. But it still needs some work, I think we would all agree.

    Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome.
    If you like birding, we want to hear from you.
    Read More »

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    Authors

    Archives

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    • Open Mic: 2014 Camp Avocet–an intern’s perspective October 13, 2014 5:38
      I don’t think there is any doubt in anyone’s mind that Camp Avocet was totally, undeniably awesome this year, so I won’t spend too long telling you all that. In mid-August 2014, a committed staff and a crew of very enthusiastic and almost unbelievably skilled campers assembled in Lewes, in southern Delaware, for the second […]
    • Open Mic: Birding Isleta Grande October 6, 2014 5:20
      There is a very good spot for birding in Central Veracruz that has been unnoticed by birders. Isleta Grande is a small village located a half hour from Xalapa. […]
    • Book Review: Petrels, Albatrosses, and Storm-Petrels of North America October 1, 2014 12:36
      Tubenoses - well-adapted birds that spend most of their lives soaring over the open ocean - are shrouded in more mystery than any other group of birds. Not only are their habitats so inaccessible, but distinguishing between cryptic species makes them a true frontier for ornithologists and birders alike. […]

    Follow ABA on Twitter

    Nature Blog Network