aba events

    The ABA, Wikipedia, and You

    Wikipedia-logo (1)Google the word “birding” and one of the very first hits will surely be the Wikipedia entry for our passion and pastime. See for yourself:


    The entry runs to 4,982 words, according to my computer, covering such topics as “The history of birdwatching,” “Competition,” “Code of conduct,” and “Famous birdwatchers.” And this: “Networking and organization.”

    The entry for “Networking and organization” is a mere 95 words long. It has links to five “prominent national and continental organizations,” three of them based in Britain, two of them from the United States. One of the American entries is the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, the other is our very own American Birding Association. (Note to old school grammarians: I’m certain that that comma is superior to a semicolon or coordinating conjunction.)

    So I clicked on the link to “American Birding Association,” and I got to a 239-word entry on the ABA. Topics covered: the ABA’s move toward a more inclusive conception of its membership; the ABA’s Code of Birding Ethics; and the ABA’s multi-authored blog, that is to say, the forum in which I’m writing right now. As many of us know, The ABA Blog recently celebrated its first birthday, which means that this particular Wikipedia entry has been updated within the past year. I’ll say more about that later.

    November coverOh. One other item caught my eye: “The ABA publishes Birding, its bimonthly magazine.” I clicked on the link to “Birding,” and that took me to a 664-word entry on our bimonthly members’ magazine.

    More than half the total verbiage (345 words, or 52%) was devoted to a single topic. Care to guess what that topic was? Perhaps bird identification? Maybe bird finding? Listing? Binoculars?

    Nope. None of those. Rather, “Demographics of birders.”

    Like you, I’m surprised.

    Conference logoDon’t get me wrong. I’m delighted by the coverage. And the topic is more timely than ever. Recently, the ABA—represented by President Jeff Gordon and board member Kenn Kaufman—participated in an important symposium on Changing the Face of American Birding.

    I’m way into the sociology of birding. And I suppose that interest—some might say that bias—of mine might conceivably influence content in Birding. But not too much, I hope. I’m wary, to say the least, of editors with agendas. I hope I got that point across in a commentary beginning on p. 56 of the November 2010 issue of Birding.

    Wait. I do have an agenda, come to think of it, an overarching agenda, a “prime directive,” if you will. It is this: to give voice, on the pages of Birding, to the diverse voices and aspirations of the birding community in North America and beyond. (Sound familiar? I said as much, in a post back in March to The ABA Blog.)

    Simply put, there’s more to Birding than articles on “Demographics of birders.” In other words, this Wikipedia entry is out of balance.

    It’s also out of date. In the first paragraph of the entry, content of the magazine is described “as of 2007.” In this internet era, four years is a long time. The entry for Birding magazine is badly in need of an update.

    And, honestly, most of the rest of the Wikipedia coverage of the ABA and its programs would benefit from a makeover.

    Before I go any further, I want to be very clear about something: I intend no criticism, none whatsoever, of the folks who have contributed to the Wikipedia entries for Birding magazine and other offerings of the ABA. Indeed, I am highly grateful for the exposure.

    But we need more of it! The Wikipedia entries for the ABA and its programs need to be updated, expanded, and rebalanced.

    And that’s where YOU come in. Anybody can contribute content to Wikipedia. It’s a piece of cake. Start off by going to:


    Then click on “Edit,” up toward the upper right.

    Then fire away!

    It’s that easy. It really is.

    Now you might be saying, “Gee, Ted, why don’t you do it?” Or “Maybe David Hartley, the ABA’s Director of Communications, could do it”? Or perhaps President Jeff Gordon or blogmeister Nate Swick?

    True, any one of the four of us could do it. So could anybody else on the staff at the ABA.

    But there’s that old problem of bias. Check out Wikipedia entries for “Occupy Wall Street” and “Tea Party Protests,” for example, and you’ll see red flags—actually, they’re yellow and orange, respectively—up front. The best Wikipedia entries are those that benefit from the broad contributions of interested, intelligent, and neutral e-citizens.

    Yes, I’m talking about YOU.

    What are you waiting for? Go on! Do it! You can put in as much or as little work as you like. Add a factoid; fix a bad URL; or rework a sentence that doesn’t quite get the point across. Or write brand-new content. For starters, the entry on Birding magazine could use a little help.

    A final thought. There’s been a lot of talk lately about public perceptions of birding and of birders. (The Big Year, anyone?) Like it or not, Wikipedia is how a sizable chunk of the world gets information. A newbie’s first contact with birding and the ABA might well be via Wikipedia.

    A final, final thought. I’m not asking—and neither, I’m sure, would any of my colleagues on staff—for a sugar-coating of the ABA. We just want a thorough, accurate, unbiased, well-informed accounting on Wikipedia of what the ABA is all about. I stand by our product, the American Birding Association. And I’m confident that YOU, contributors to and readers of The ABA Blog, are the best-qualified persons in the world for educating the general public about birders, birding, and the ABA.


    The following two tabs change content below.

    Ted Floyd

    Ted Floyd is the Editor of Birding magazine, and he is broadly involved in other programs and initiatives of the ABA. He is the author of more than 100 magazine and journal articles, and has written four recent books, including an ABA title, the ABA Guide to Birds of Colorado. Floyd is a frequent speaker at birding festivals and state ornithological society meetings, and he has served on the boards of several nonprofit organizations. Mainly, he listens to birds at night.

    Latest posts by Ted Floyd (see all)

    • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds Megan Crewe

      It’s not just the ABA entries that could use some help. Many of Wikipedia’s bird entries are mere stubs, with little more than the most basic of information. There’s a great, very active project that’s working to correct that, and we’re always looking for new members. Interested in learning more about some aspect of birding? Do a little research and write about it for the world! I’ve been part of the project for nearly 4.5 years now, and have greatly enjoyed the opportunity to expand (and share) my knowledge while working with committed birders/environmentalists from around the globe.

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Megan, can you tell us a little more about this “great, very active project”? Sounds fantastic.

      Is it British? (Which is fine, of course.) I detect a large dollop of British English in a lot of the Wikipedia content on birds–especially on bird conservation.

    • Duncan

      Ted, The project megan alludes to is the Bird Wikiproject, of which both of us are members. You can find us here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds > The members come from the US, Australia the UK, India and New Zealand amongst others. English usage varies by subject, American birds should be in American English, British in British,etc, and shared or unaffiliated birds or articles generally in the language they were first written (many of which were started by a Brit).

      I agree with the thrust of your article, we could very certainly do to improve the articles you mentioned, along with many others, and we’d love for ABA members to work on those articles!

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Thanks, Duncan, for this info. I’ve just looked over the guidelines for the project, and the whole thing looks great. (And we’ve given it some exposure via http://twitter.com/BirdingMagazine, feeding straight to http://aba.org.)

      I’d like now to emphasize just how incredibly easy it for anybody to contribute to this effort, and to make a difference, right now, immediately.

      For example, I just typed into my browser the phrase “American Kestrel Wikipedia.” (American Kestrel happens to the 2011 ABA Bird of the Year.) I browsed the entry, and quickly found a statement that was a bit unclear. So I changed it. It’s that easy! It really is!

      All of us can do it. All of us can make a difference. All of us can inform the broader e-public about the birds we love to watch.

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd


      I just checked out the ABA’s Wikipedia page:


      And I see that it’s been importantly updated in the past day or so. Many thanks to whoever did that. But it still needs some work, I think we would all agree.

    Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome.
    If you like birding, we want to hear from you.
    Read More »

    Recent Comments

    • David La Puma, in The Chicago Connection... { ...and The Grateful Dead. }
    • Frank Izaguirre, in The Chicago Connection... { Just checking in to say At Play in the Fields of the Lord is also one of my favorite movies. And it might be worth... }
    • Tony Leukering, in Rare Bird Alert: January 23, 2015... { Three recently released condors showed up in Colorado at Lands End on the Grand Mesa some time early in the Vermillion introduction efforts. Interestingly, that... }
    • SirNoodle, in Great Expectations... { My vote is for Sandhill Crane, since I saw one in Broomfield on January 2 this year. }
    • Mike C, in Rare Bird Alert: January 23, 2015... { As i recall, the Arizona birds were introduced to the Vermillion Cliffs area which is very near the Utah border. So, one would expect to... }
    • Older »




    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    • Young Birder Blog Birding #36 December 30, 2014 6:50
      As the year winds down, many of us are enjoying or preparing for Christmas Bird Counts! […]
    • Open Mic: Birds of the Black Forest Fire December 23, 2014 7:01
      When I took on the challenge of the 2014 Young Birder of the Year Contest, I was fully aware that it would be the hardest thing I had ever done. I planned to devote myself to the study of birds for nearly six months spending hours each day compiling a field notebook, studying nest boxes, […]
    • 2014 Iowa/Illinois Young Birder Weekend December 15, 2014 9:37
      By Carl Bendorf On June 14-15, 2014, Iowa Young Birders and Illinois Young Birders hosted a joint field trip weekend along the Mississippi River.  Twenty four young birders from Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin had a great time exploring a variety of habitats. One of the highlights was spending time with special guest, Rachael Butek, 2010 ABA Young […]

    Follow ABA on Twitter