Nikon Monarch 7

« Birding WebExtras: July 2012 | Main | Blog Birding #95 »

08/12/2012

Kitty Cams support claim that feral cats affect birds

by Nate Swick

Via 10,000 Birds

Understanding that I'm wading into the fraught topic that so many bird listservs have banned, I offer a recent study from the University of Georgia, assisted by the National Geographic Society, adding more evidence to the claim advanced by the American Bird Conservancy and others (including Anne Nightingale here at the ABA Blog) that outdoor cats have a significant negative impact on populations of birds. 

And the way they acquired that evidence is pretty ingenious, from an article on the study in the LA Times:

Using cameras attached to the collars of your friendly neighborhood cats, researchers at the University of Georgia found that the feline fighters kill much larger numbers of wildlife than previously thought. That may be because such earlier studies didn't consider animals that the cats ate or simply left behind, said biologist Kerrie Anne Lloyd, who presented her findings at a Portland, Ore., meeting of the Ecological Society of America.

In cooperation with the National Geographic Society's CritterCam team, which attaches cameras to animals to record the activities of a variety of species, Lloyd and her colleagues recruited 60 cat owners in Athens, Ga. The owners attached the tiny cameras to the cats' collars every morning when the animals were let out, then dowloaded the day's images every night. Each animal was followed for seven to 10 days.

Nearly a third of the cats killed prey, an average of two a week.  Remarkably, or perhaps not, the cats left 49% of their kills to rot, consuming only 30% and bringing the remainder home to what were certainly non-plussed owners.  This suggests that pet owners see only a very small proportion of what the cats actually get up to.

It's worth noting that the cats in the study were all pets, with homes and regular feeding schedules, and not the feral colonies that have sparked political firestorms with regard to their management.  The latter are almost certainly worse.

Once again, the evidence is abundantly clear, please heed the American Bird Conservancy's pleas to be responsible pet-owners and keep those pets indoors not only for the birds' safety, but their own as well. 

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bookmark and Share

Welcome to the ABA Blog!
Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome. If you like birding, we want to hear from you.

See something here that you really like or find useful? Or something that you think is wrong or misguided? Leave a comment and let us all know. Just keep your comments respectful; that's the only requirement.

We welcome guest posts, too. Have an idea or tip or story you'd like to share? Contact blog manager Nate Swick at blog@aba.org.

The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of each contributing writer or commenter and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the American Birding Association or its management. Official positions of the ABA will be clearly labelled as such.

Good birding! And thanks for stopping by.

Recent Posts

ABA Bloggers

George Armistead
Lynn Barber
Jeff Bouton
Ned Brinkley
Laura Erickson
Ted Floyd
Jeff Gordon
Paul Hess
Blake Mathys
Robert Mortensen
Greg Neise
Ann Nightingale
John Puschock
Michael Retter
Bill Schmoker
Noah Strycker
Brian Sullivan
Nate Swick
Drew Weber
Rick Wright

Other ABA Blogs

The Eyrie
ABA blog for young birders

Nature Blog Network