aba events

#ABArare – Oriental Cuckoo – Alaska

facebooktwitter

All eyes turn to western Alaska in early June, as intrepid guides and tour participants comb the Bering Sea Islands and the Aleutians in search of Asian overshoots. While in the past, far Attu was often the singular target, now that the island is more difficult (though not impossible!) to reach the spotlight has turned more towards the Pribilofs and St. Lawrence as spring destinations. And for good reason, both sites have seen an impressible list of rarities in recent years.

Prologue aside, one of the early highlights is an apparent Oriental Cuckoo (ABA Code 4), discovered by Glen Davis and photographed by Cory Gregory (both with St. Paul Island Tours) on June 4 and continuing the next day, on St. Paul Island in the Pribilofs.

photographed by Corey Gregory, used with permission

photographed by Cory Gregory, used with permission

More photos are available at Cory’s flickr page.

St Paul Island is accessible by air via several Alaskan airports, most notably Anchorage, on Penair Airlines.

Oriental Cuckoo is known in the ABA Area from around 10 records and 5 specimens, exclusively from the Bering Sea Islands and Aleutians. Field identification of the species is extremely difficult, given to its similarity with the more regularly occurring Common Cuckoo.  In fact, this bird was identified in the field as a Common Cuckoo before photos obtained by Cory Gregory suggested otherwise upon examination. Though the distinctions between the two remain poorly defined, adult Oriental Cuckoo tends to have courser bands on the breast and a buffier belly and undertail coverts.

According to Scott Schuette, this is the 4th record of the species on St. Paul, and the first since 2004.

The following two tabs change content below.
Nate Swick

Nate Swick

Nate Swick is the editor of the American Birding Association Blog. A long-time member of the bird blogosphere, Nate has been writing about birds and birding at The Drinking Bird since 2007, but can also be found writing regularly at 10,000 Birds. In the non-digital world, he's an environmental educator and interpretive naturalist. Nate lives in Greensboro, North Carolina, with his wife, Danielle, and two young children, who are not yet aware that they are being groomed to be birders.
Nate Swick

Latest posts by Nate Swick (see all)

  • Cory Gregory

    The bird was still present yesterday, June 7.

  • Paul Lehman

    Actually, underpart barring differences between these two species is likely over-rated, and there is substantial overlap. One potential important difference is underwing pattern: slightly bolder / more contrasty in Oriental, though this is hard to see in the field and is best analyzed using good flight shots. Also, on average, Oriental averages shorter billed and darker gray above. There are a few ID papers out there concerning these two species, including one I authored a number of years ago for the British publication “Birding World.”

    –Paul Lehman, San Diego

    • http://blog.aba.org/ Nate Swick

      Good stuff. Thanks, Paul.

    • John Puschock

      I looked at the Burke Museum’s collection of Common and Oriental Cuckoo spread wings. Oriental has fewer white spots/bars on the underside of the primaries, though there seems to be a little overlap. Adult Orientals largely had five white spots on the outermost primary while adult Common had six. Immatures of both species tended to have an additional spot, so six on Oriental and seven on Common.

      I know there’s one paper out there that talks about the number of white spots on the primaries overall, but I don’t know if any talk about the outermost primary specifically. The latest version of the National Geographic guide shows Oriental with fewer spots, but it’s not talked about in the text. I don’t think any other guides shows or talks about this.

      Cory Gregory’s photos show five spots on the outer primary, so consistent with Oriental. Furthermore, Oriental is noticeably smaller in a museum drawer. The photos appear to show a smaller bird to me, too, but I’m biased at this point. The photos also show some brownish coloration on the upper breast, so I’m guessing this is a female.

  • Mike Danzenbaker

    I’ve just returned from Mongolia where I was able to observe and photograph both species, sometimes at the same sites. My personal preliminary conclusion is that there may be no single reliable criterion on which to make a visual, not-in-hand field ID, and I have left all non-vocalizing individuals unidentified for now. Even aging and sexing is not straightforward in many cases. I looked mainly at underpart barring, lower belly / UTC color, upperpart darkness, rump/UTC color relative to the back, soft parts and head/bill structure. I haven’t yet examined folded primary spotting. Perhaps detailed underwing photos (which I didn’t obtain) might prove useful; there are some examples of these online, but even these I find murky. I would have liked to have had both species pose for me side-by-side, but they weren’t keen on doing this.

    I heard second-hand from a Swede last week that Finland recently re-evaluated its records of silent Oriental Cuckoo and rejected them all. I couldn’t find any mention of this online and so you could take this with a grain of salt.

    I say all this not to cast any aspersion on the ID of the bird at hand (the details of which I don’t know), but rather to urge extreme caution with these species in general. I’m not sure I know of any more difficult field ID problem.

  • Pingback: Rare Bird Alert: June 13, 2014 « ABA Blog()

Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome.
If you like birding, we want to hear from you.
Read More »

Recent Comments

  • Rare Bird Alert: April 24, 2015 « ABA Blog { […] last but certainly not least, the rarity season in south Florida is heating up, with a heard-only Cuban Pewee (5) frustratingly avoiding birders near... }
  • Ruth Hanessian, in Birding is Hard... { Greg's comments are right on but from a much older perspective I am now delighted to study more closely the "common" species in my back... }
  • Birding Online: February 2015 « ABA Publications { […] ABA members have access to the full text in magazine format of Keith Betton’s review of a new Helm Guide to Bird ID, as... }
  • Birding Online: February 2015 « ABA Publications { […] magazine is open for discussion at The ABA Blog. So it is with the February featured photo, where ABA members are sharing their questions... }
  • Cameron Cox, in Birding is Hard... { While I agreed with most of the sentiments Greg expresses, I find I cannot agreed with the conclusion if the conclusion is the title of... }
  • Older »

Categories

Authors

Archives

via email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Wildlife Ecology Research April 22, 2015 11:35
    Rensselaerville Falls, Huyck Preserve and Biological Research Station. July 13, 2014. What: Wildlife Ecology Research Program for high school students entering their Junior or Senior Year. Where: Huyck Preserve and Biological Research Station 5052 Delaware Turnpike Rensselaerville, NY 12147 When: Late applications due May 1 by 5 PM, EDT. Session I—July 5-26 Session II—August […]
  • Young Birder Blog Birding #37 April 8, 2015 4:19
    For many birders, February is a month of waiting. After February, the snow will melt and the first Killdeers and American Woodcocks will usher in a parade of exciting spring migrants. […]
  • Open Mic: Searching for Snowy Owls in Ohio March 25, 2015 5:22
    At the beginning of this year, I remembered missing the chance to spot a Snowy Owl when the bird stormed across the United States the previous winter, so I was determined to see one of these birds this winter. […]

Follow ABA on Twitter