aba events
Nikon Monarch 7

    Green Birding

     “Birds undeniably contribute to our pleasure and standard of living. But they also are sensitive indicators of the environment, a sort of ‘ecological litmus paper,’ and hence more meaningful than just chickadees and cardinals to brighten the suburban garden, grouse and ducks to fill the sportsman’s bag, or rare warblers and shorebirds to be ticked off the birder’s checklist. The observation of birds leads inevitably to environmental awareness.”

    Those are the opening words from the most famous and influential bird book of all time, A Field Guide to the Birds by Roger Tory Peterson. Practically every birder I’ve met would agree with Peterson’s credo that “[t]he observation of birds leads inevitably to environmental awareness.” If you have anything more than the slightest passing interest in birds, you inevitably discover the importance of, say, habitat protection and clean water. And many birders go way beyond those basic environmental precepts; today’s birders tend to have a gratifyingly sophisticated understanding of such complex topics as invasive organisms, landscape ecology, and climate change.

    It’s one thing to be aware of the environment. It’s quite another to do something with that awareness. What do birders do? For starters, many birders support the environmental cause by providing financial support to The Nature Conservancy, the National Audubon Society, and so forth. Birders also provide support via the electoral process, by voting for candidates or referenda aligned with environmentally friendly actions. And birders roll up their sleeves from time to time: They join in efforts to plant trees or pick up trash, they visit classrooms, they volunteer at parks and refuges.

    Yes, most birders have gone “green.” I don’t mean they all vote for Green Party candidates, or even for Democrats. In their thoughts and words, though, most birders are concerned about the environment. I doubt there are many birders who smile at the sight of habitat destruction, who get a chuckle out of polluted waterways.

     

    01 Bike to school day
    Hannah Floyd (left) and Ted Floyd (right) have enlisted in Lafayette Elementary’s “Bike to School” effort. Everybody has gone “green,” it would seem. But could we be doing more for the environment? Photo by Kei Sochi.

     

    Here’s another generalization I’m willing to make: Most birders are affluent. I don’t mean they’re all millionaires, or even especially “comfortable.” But birding is a leisure activity, plain and simple. Show me a poor, starving bird bum, and I’ll show you a young adult who had a good upbringing: access to generally good nutrition and schooling, and—more than anything else—all-important access to opportunity.

    By virtue of their affluence, birders get around. They burn up the frequent-flier miles; they own and make frequent use of SUVs with poor fuel efficiency. They wear expensive clothes, they stay in hotels, they eat out. Birders carry expensive optics. They own lots of bird books. Birding is a hugely consumptive hobby. Birders’ hearts and minds may well be “green,” but their lifestyles are anything but.

    What are we to make of the vexing disconnect between birders’ environmental beliefs and consumptive ways?

    “Conservation is getting nowhere,” wrote Aldo Leopold in the famous forward to A Sand County Almanac, because of our “Abrahamic” sense of entitlement. The world is ours to do with as we please, to consume and commodify. A rare bird is reported, and the chase is on! Grab the Leica scope, toss it in the back of the Lexus SUV, swing by the ATM for gas money (and swing by Mickey D’s for carbs), and hit the road!

    Like Henry David Thoreau before him, Leopold retreated from the consumer lifestyle by engaging in low-tech living in the country. Thoreau and Leopold and others of their ilk are typically portrayed as mavericks, radicals even. Their rhetoric is dire and urgent, at times militant. Who among us could ever pledge to live according to the “land ethic” prescribed by Leopold?

    And yet it occurs to me that Thoreau and Leopold anticipated what we birders nowadays refer to as “patchwork”—the intensive, low-budget, highly rewarding study of birds around our “patches,” that is to say, parks and open space near home.

     

    02a Greenlee preserve
    Patchworkers Ted Floyd (left) and Hannah Floyd (center) with friend Larry Neel (right) at Greenlee Preserve, Colorado. Photo by Kei Sochi.

     

    Gee, that was easy. By committing ourselves to patchwork, we birders achieve the ambitious, even revolutionary, vision of Aldo Leopold.

    Of course, it’s not that simple. For one thing, the mainstream birding culture in North America isn’t terribly friendly to the idea of patchwork. In order to become a “good” birder, the argument goes, one has to get around a fair bit, consuming an awful lot in the process. Another obstacle is that Leopold’s fundamentally agrarian outlook is unrealistic in the twenty-first century. It would be nice if every birder—indeed every person—could retreat to his or her own “shack,” the name Leopold gave to his idyllic getaway in Sauk County, Wisconsin. Sorry, but that was a pleasant—almost elitist—fantasy for the first half of the twentieth century.

    We’re in need of another way forward, it seems to me, in this rapidly urbanizing, constantly technologizing world of ours.

    Enter the American Birding Association (ABA).

    I think the ABA could lead the way in the “greening” of American society. Here’s how. On the one hand, the ABA would do well to heed Leopold’s denunciation of our society’s Abrahamic character. On the other hand, the ABA might consider an action that would have been perplexing, to say the least, to Leopold: I think the ABA should move its headquarters to a major American city.

     

    03 Denver
    The future home of the ABA? By moving to a large city, might the ABA help advance a deeply meaningful transformation of American society? Photo by Bill Schmoker—http://www.schmoker.org/BirdPics/

     

    Cities are full of people; we all know that. Cities are likewise full of wonderful “patches,” a fact lost on many urbanites, including birders. Imagine if the ABA were headquartered at New York’s Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge or Philadelphia’s John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge. Thousands of people visit those refuges—local patches writ large—during the course of the year. Imagine if the ABA were able to reach practically all those visitors with Leopold’s “land ethic” and Peterson’s conviction that birds contribute to our pleasure and standard of living.

    The upshot? The ABA might go down in the history books as the organization that finally succeeded at propelling American society toward Leopold’s ultimate vision:

    “Recreational development is a job not of building roads into lovely country, but of building receptivity into the still unlovely human mind.”

     

    The following two tabs change content below.
    Ted Floyd

    Ted Floyd

    Ted Floyd is the Editor of Birding magazine, and he is broadly involved in other programs and initiatives of the ABA. He is the author of more than 100 magazine and journal articles, and has written four recent books, including an ABA title, the ABA Guide to Birds of Colorado. Floyd is a frequent speaker at birding festivals and state ornithological society meetings, and he has served on the boards of several nonprofit organizations. Mainly, he listens to birds at night.
    Ted Floyd

    Latest posts by Ted Floyd (see all)

    • http://www.birding.typepad.com/gulf drew wheelan

      Thanks Ted for enunciating and elucidating the ideas and thoughts that have been swimming in my head. A very well written and forward thinking piece.

    • http://www.aslansown.com Connie Kogler

      Good stuff, Ted. I find myself birding more and more locally, in “patches”. Something is just right about it.

    • http://www.thedrinkingbirdblog.com Nate

      While I always always enjoyed birding my local patch, I’ve found that using eBird has taken that interest to another level. It’s so much easier now to get that graphical representation of abundance at a site and it’s really rewarding to be able to influence that in the form of filling in gaps and smoothing out trend lines.

      It’s exactly the sort of thing that appeals to this lister without the messier aspects of twitching of which we’re all well aware.

    • http://www.wildbirdmagazine.com Amy

      Perhaps ABA would consider moving to the Los Angeles area, often thought to consist only of concrete and freeways. Oh, the stereotypes I encounter!

      Southern California is ripe with with patches — but as a native resident (do I qualify as an endangered species?), I might be biased.

    • http://profile.typepad.com/tfloyd Ted Floyd

      Amy: I like to inform birders (and nonbirders) that burly Los Angeles was the first county in the USA to surpass the 500-species threshold, long thought unattainable. Folks are amazed when I tell them that; they assume the city with the biggest list would be somewhere like Cape May or Brownsville or something. Nope.

      By way of comparison, the bird list for London (UK) is around 360 species. And they’ve been birding there since the Dark Ages. Literally.

      Anyhow, LA is amazing for birding, stereotypes notwithstanding.

    • http://greenbirding.blogspot.com/ Jim Royer

      ABA could give more attention to more environmentally responsible birding by publishing and encouraging green birding categories such as green big years, green big days, and green life lists. This would help by providing an alternative to gas consuming big years, days, and lists by car and plane. I have heard that ABA has considered such additions. Is this a reality yet?

    • http://www.greenbirding.ca Richard Gregson

      I’d like to reiterate Jim Royer’s comment (1 June 2011) that “ABA could give more attention to more environmentally responsible birding ….. I have heard that ABA has considered such additions. Is this a reality yet?”

      But they do not, for some reason, seem particularly interested in taking even small steps in this direction despite the growing interest there is in this alternative way of local, patch-focused birding with a minimal carbon footprint etc.

      It is for that reason that the Greenbirding website (www.greenbirding.ca ) was re-launched recently … we will certainly provide a forum for “publishing and encouraging green birding categories such as green big years, green big days, and green life lists.”

    Birders know well that the healthiest, most dynamic choruses contain many different voices. The birding community encompasses a wide variety of interests, talents, and convictions. All are welcome.
    If you like birding, we want to hear from you.
    Read More »

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    Authors

    Archives

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    • Open Mic: 2014 Camp Avocet–an intern’s perspective October 13, 2014 5:38
      I don’t think there is any doubt in anyone’s mind that Camp Avocet was totally, undeniably awesome this year, so I won’t spend too long telling you all that. In mid-August 2014, a committed staff and a crew of very enthusiastic and almost unbelievably skilled campers assembled in Lewes, in southern Delaware, for the second […]
    • Open Mic: Birding Isleta Grande October 6, 2014 5:20
      There is a very good spot for birding in Central Veracruz that has been unnoticed by birders. Isleta Grande is a small village located a half hour from Xalapa. […]
    • Book Review: Petrels, Albatrosses, and Storm-Petrels of North America October 1, 2014 12:36
      Tubenoses - well-adapted birds that spend most of their lives soaring over the open ocean - are shrouded in more mystery than any other group of birds. Not only are their habitats so inaccessible, but distinguishing between cryptic species makes them a true frontier for ornithologists and birders alike. […]

    Follow ABA on Twitter

    Nature Blog Network